In particular, Reinfeldt made the important point to me that picking the foreign policy high representative and picking the first full-time president are not the same thing. The presidency is a job wholly in the gift of the EU’s 27 national leaders, but the foreign policy position is not.
On the contrary, because its holder will serve as a European Commission vice-president, he or she must be acceptable to Commission president José Manuel Barroso and to the European Parliament. Indeed, the parliament will conduct hearings soon into Barroso’s new Commission team, and it could in theory cause enough trouble to force the withdrawal of the foreign policy nominee.
http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/im ... 66383.aspx
The Parliament had intended to start hearings... on 26 November so that the Parliament could vote in plenary on approving the whole team in December. But the additional delay caused by a later-than-expected summit, means that the Parliament is likely to start hearings only in January... the target was 20 January... therefore (the next commission) may not take office before February.
http://news.penki.lt/news.aspx?Lang=EN& ... eID=217466
German Green MEP Rebecca Harms: "We need to agree that we want strong men and women in the top positions of the EU. Mr Reinfeldt, unfortunately I'm not able to congratulate you because there is as yet no sign of any strong men and women coming forward."
http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/im ... 66394.aspx
The agreement reached two weeks ago that the socialists would come up with a candidate for the high representative while the centre-right would take the post of president of the European Council seemed, on the face of it, to strengthen Miliband's chances. Reinfeldt could balance Miliband, someone who is nominally a socialist, from one of the larger member states, against a candidate from the centre-right from one of the smaller member states – such as Jan Peter Balkenende, Herman Van Rompuy or Wolfgang Schüssel.
But Miliband, at least for the moment, prefers to remain in domestic British politics.
http://www.theparliament.com/no_cache/l ... bby-deals/
Debate on new EU jobs 'descended into shabby deals'
http://www.isria.com/pages/11_November_2009_83.php
The author reports that the two top candidates for the position are British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, and former Italian Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Massimo De'alma, and adds: "Jerusalem is saying that these two candidates from the ranks of the European Left, can be labeled as 'problematic,' as far as Israel is concerned. Miliband's Jewish background is liable, it is feared here, to push him, incongruously, to stringent and critical stances, and the Italian candidate, identified as being pro-Arab, has never attempted to hide his positions.
MY COMMENT
( to add to the cornucopia of nonsense)
1) So even if one person gets the nod the parliament could change it all
as late as February 2010
2) So far there are no strongmen or women coming forward and current contenders for the position are problematic (even for Israel)
3) The HRCFSP is to be a socialist
4) Debate on new EU jobs has 'descended into shabby deals'
3) Solana is a Socialist and a strong man and the socialists are a major power in the parliament capable of shabby deals
4) At least we have some real guess as to who will emerge victorious even if others do not.

This is dragging on way too long! The suspense is killing me.
And if I am in a room next to yours, please be gentle with me.

