Recommendation 666 was already completed when in October, 2001, I asked former Secretary of Defense, William Cohen, since the EU had created its own independent military wing, if NATO would become a relic of the past. His answer was, in his opinion, "it [an independent EU military wing] hadn't happened." Well, after five years time, what I recorded in Recommendation 666 is still credible. In fact, it's more credible today than when written.

However, the implications of Recommendation 666 still being credible may be far more serious for God's people than for NATO. How many books have we seen written by well intended authors attempting to show why they believed the end-times prophecies were being fulfilled? And, how long have these books remained credible? Usually not very long. Friends, if after five years my book remains credible, that should be telling us something. In fact, as of today's date, I still see no reason to revise Recommendation 666.

Perhaps the most interesting part is how I didn't understand all the implications myself. When I first stumbled on the Western European Union's Assembly Recommendation 666, I didn't really know what to think. All I knew was that the recommendation had something to do with what I had just witnessed happening in the EU. It took time to learn its possible significance. And, even after five more years since writing Recommendation 666, I'm still learning. For example, take a look at what's below -- something more discovered later. Follow the images left to right.

Notice where the emergency powers reside; In the Political and Security Committee (PSC). Friends, this is the same PSC that's in the EU's so-called "Geostrategic Triangle."

Yes, Recommendation 666 may still be credible.